jadensababe505 jadensababe505
  • 22-05-2018
  • Social Studies
contestada

When warning users about the dangers of products, writers should avoid using mandatory language such as must and shall?

Respuesta :

andriansp andriansp
  • 31-05-2018
I believe the answer is: False

Mandatory language is actually advisable to be used in this situation.
Using mandatory language would set a clear limitation that make the consumers understand the magnitude of the danger. This would make them much more likely to follow the written warning.
Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Why do all cells need DNA?
What issue were the Virginia and New Jersey Plans attempting to resolve?
$1,500 computer; 7% tax
what equals 19 in multiplication
4 interesting facts about the earths crust
what could you do to change the volume of a gas
Elsie would like to take snowboarding lessons at powder mountain. She has saved $550 for lessons and a junior season pass that costs $315. She wants to take sem
A 1913 California law forced Japanese Americans to A. learn English. B. sell their land. C. sign unfair labor contracts. D. become United States citizens.
Who were the philosophes , and what did they believe In
What type of number is shown below? 0.313311333111... A. Repeating decimal B. rational C. irrational D. terminating decimal